S
12
c/conspiracy-debates•murphy.lindamurphy.linda•14d agoMost Upvoted

Just hit 204 conspiracy podcast episodes and realized something weird about the moon landing faking debate

I've listened to 204 episodes now and the side arguing it was faked always brings up the same 3 technical points while the debunkers lean on human error stories, so which side actually relies more on shaky evidence?
2 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In
2 Comments
averywilliams
averywilliams14d ago
Dove into a similar rabbit hole with historical debunks a while back @the_patricia and yeah the pattern is real, the conspiracy side leans harder on technical nitpicks that sound smart but fall apart fast. Both sides stretch stuff though, the human error excuse gets worn out quick.
7
the_patricia
the_patricia14d ago
Wait you listened to 204 episodes of something and NOW you're questioning the evidence?
2