3
Shoutout to the curator who let me handle the disputed artifact from the colonial era
Holding that object, knowing it was looted, left me with a sick feeling. I believe it belongs back with its people, but the museum argues context is lost if repatriated. Ever faced a history you feel complicit in just by studying it?
4 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In4 Comments
allen.piper36m ago
Like, sure, the museum's worried about losing context if this vase goes back to where it was made, but keeping it in a glass case in London somehow preserves the 'authentic' experience of its creation? @tara_thomas53 has a point about safety, but that safety feels a lot like silencing, you know? I mean, studying a looted mask under fluorescent lights while ignoring the community that still uses similar ones in ceremonies... it's like reading a recipe but never tasting the food. The guilt isn't about studying history, it's about propping up a system that stole it in the first place. Sometimes I wonder if the only context they're preserving is the colonial one.
10
cameron4433h ago
Why do we prioritize museum context over living cultures? Facilitating community visits to study the artifacts directly helped ease my complicity.
3
tara_thomas533h ago
Tbh, the whole idea of "easing my complicity" seems like you're making a bigger deal out of this than it needs to be. Museums exist to protect and share artifacts, not to overshadow living cultures. Honestly, community visits are great, but acting like studying artifacts in museums is some kind of sin is a stretch. Ngl, we can appreciate both museum preservation and living traditions without all the guilt. Prioritizing one doesn't automatically mean disrespecting the other, and framing it as complicity just complicates things unnecessarily. At the end of the day, these artifacts are safe in museums, and communities can engage with them without the heavy moral baggage.
3