My two week trip to Lisbon cost under $400 total, but I'm not sure that's a good thing

I just got back and added up all my costs for food, a bed in a hostel, and local transport. The final number was $387. I saved a lot by eating from grocery stores and walking everywhere. Some friends say that's the whole point of budget travel, getting the cost way down. Others say I missed the real experience of the city by not trying any sit down meals or paid tours. I think I saw a lot, but maybe I was too focused on the number. What do you think is more important, hitting a super low budget or spending a bit more for local experiences?

3 comments

3 Comments

the_patricia1d ago

Man, I've been there. That nagging feeling you get when the budget looks great but the trip feels thin. Walking everywhere and grocery store dinners will save a ton, but you're right, you can lose the flavor of the place. Next time, maybe pick one or two things that really matter. Like, in Lisbon, skip a tour but get a proper pastel de nata from a real bakery and sit down with a coffee. It's not about spending a lot, it's about spending on the right thing so you come back with stories, not just a low number.

seth68311d ago

Honestly that's a solid budget win right there. Tbh I did the same thing in Prague and kinda regret not trying a proper restaurant at least once.

the_fiona11d ago

Yeah, that feeling is totally real, @seth683. Saving money feels smart at the time, but you can miss out on a real taste of the place. It's like you get the trip but not the full experience. I had the same thing happen in Lisbon, just grabbing cheap eats. Later I realized I never tried the real local food. The balance is tough, but one nice meal can be worth it.