29
Debate: Should brands apologize fast or wait for facts? I picked wrong.
My buddy runs a small coffee chain. Last month a barista messed up a drink for a customer with allergies. He had two choices. Issue a quick apology right then or hold off until he had the full story from the staff. He went with the fast apology, said sorry on social media within 2 hours. Turns out the customer was actually fine and the barista followed safety rules. The apology got shared everywhere as a 'fake concern' thing. Now people think he was lying. He regrets not waiting 24 hours to get the facts straight first. Has anyone else seen a brand jump the gun and regret it?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
the_thomas1mo ago
Ha! Classic case of caring more about optics than truth.
4
phoenix_thompson41mo ago
Exactly, I've been on both sides of this and the real trick is to just say "I don't have all the info yet, give me a minute" before you open your mouth. A quick check beats a rushed apology every time.
7
nancy4751mo ago
Wait, don't you think it's a little unfair to call it a "fake concern" thing? He really did care about the customer's safety, he just acted too fast without all the facts first. That's different from putting on a show for attention. Most small business owners mean well when they jump the gun like that, they're just scared of a bad situation getting worse. His mistake was apologizing before he knew what actually happened, not pretending to care.
3