Loading…
3
Warning: our book club picked a memoir based on a 2010 review, half the events got debunked
We met at the public library downtown last Tuesday and split into three camps over whether the author actually lived in Prague or just visited for a long weekend. One member pulled up court records from 2006 that contradicted a whole chapter. Now I won't touch any book older than 5 years unless someone fact-checks the timeline first. How do you all handle memoirs that turn out to be fiction-lite?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
dixon.spencer1mo ago
I once picked a memoir for my old book club because the cover had a pretty mountain on it, so clearly I'm the last person who should be giving fact-checking advice. But yeah, getting burned by a fake Prague apartment is rough. These days I just assume every memoir has at least one scene that got "remembered" a little too perfectly, like the guy who recalls exact dialogue from a conversation in 1987. The timeline stuff is what gets me though, because you can stretch a feeling but you can't live in a city for three days and call it your home. My new rule is if the author's bio uses the word "based on" anywhere, I'm out.
8
ellis.mia1mo ago
That "based on" rule is smart. I heard a writer on a podcast say publishers actually push for that wording when they know some stuff is shaky, because it covers them legally. So you're basically reading a warning label. Three days in a city and calling it home is wild though, like that's not a memoir, that's a layover.
1