13
Heard a client say he only trusts barbers with over 10 years in the chair
I was cleaning up my station after a cut yesterday and the guy in the next chair was talking to his barber. He said, 'I only let guys who've been cutting for a decade or more touch my hair, no offense.' His barber just nodded, but it got me thinking hard. On one side, I get it. Experience means you've seen every hair type and head shape, and you've probably dealt with any mess up. You're steady. But I've been cutting for 4 years now in Tampa, and some of the fresher barbers I know are way more up on modern styles and techniques, like skin fades with a straight razor. They're hungry and watch all the new tutorial videos. So is it really about the time, or is it about the skill and keeping up? Where do you stand on experience versus fresh talent?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
the_fiona1mo ago
That reminds me of my old barber who had been cutting since the 80s. He gave a great basic cut but never really learned how to do a proper fade, so I had to switch.
9
the_nina1mo ago
Hot take: Time served doesn't mean skills earned.
That client is paying for a safe bet, not the best cut. A barber who stopped learning after year five has ten years of the same experience. The hungry new barber with four years who studies constantly has more relevant skill right now. It's about the work you put in, not just the calendar. I'd take passion and current technique over complacent seniority any day.
6