One contract review in Phoenix cleared a $14k invoice dispute

Last month an old client of mine tried to stiff us on a campaign we already finished. They claimed the deliverables were late, but I dug back through our signed agreement and found a line about client feedback timelines that they blew past by 9 days. That single clause was the whole argument, we sent a one page recap with the dates and they paid within 48 hours. I never used to read the penalty sections closely, now I check those before any project kicks off. Anyone else had a contract line save them from a messy fight?

2 comments

Log in to join the discussion

Log In

2 Comments

hannahk191mo ago

The 9 day gap is wild, did that client try to argue the feedback timeline was "unreasonable" before you showed them the clause? Ive had people pull that move where they stall on approvals then blame me for the schedule, so im curious if the signed line was enough or if you had to also pull their email timestamps to back it up.

2

allen.charlie1mo ago

The email timestamps angle is a real thing, and honestly that's usually where the fight actually lives. Contract lines are great but they only matter if you can prove the other side missed the window, which means you gotta keep a paper trail of every single back and forth. I've had a similar situation where the clause was crystal clear but the client tried to claim they sent feedback on time, and it took pulling up three separate email threads to show they were actually responding to the wrong version of the draft. That recap you sent probably worked because it tied the clause to specific dates they couldn't argue with, not just the legal wording. Now I screenshot every approval request with the timestamp and drop it in a folder, feels paranoid but it's saved me twice already.

1